Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.
You must share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you should find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. p2p 순위 However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.